GMA 950 vs Tesla K80

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Generation 3.5 (2005)
GPU code nameGK210Lakeport
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date17 November 2014 (9 years ago)1 May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496no data
Core clock speed562 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate171.40.66
Floating-point processing power4.113 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5012 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth240.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.7-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 1 May 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 7 Watt

Tesla K80 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 950, on the other hand, has 4185.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80 and GMA 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation graphics card while GMA 950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80
Intel GMA 950
GMA 950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 181 vote

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 133 votes

Rate GMA 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.