Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Tesla K80

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking346not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.51no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGK210Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date17 November 2014 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496896
Core clock speed562 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate171.4123.2
Floating-point processing power4.113 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs4824
TMUs20856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth240.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.7-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 65 Watt

Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 361.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80 and Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 183 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.