GeForce Go 7900 SE vs Tesla K40s

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK110BG73
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 November 2013 (10 years ago)18 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed745 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate210.24.200
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs24012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s21.31 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 18 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 20 Watt

Tesla K40s has an age advantage of 7 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Go 7900 SE, on the other hand, has 1125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40s and GeForce Go 7900 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K40s is a workstation card while GeForce Go 7900 SE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40s
Tesla K40s
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 SE
GeForce Go 7900 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla K40s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.