Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Tesla K20c

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking486not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Power efficiency2.74no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK110no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores249616
Core clock speed706 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate146.8no data
Floating-point processing power3.524 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs208no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount5 GBno data
Memory bus width320 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1300 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 17 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20c and Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K20c is a workstation card while Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 12 votes

Rate Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 193 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.