CMP 100HX-210 vs Tesla K20Xm

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking527not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency2.24no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK110GV100
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26885120
Core clock speed732 MHz555 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1147 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate164.0367.0
Floating-point processing power3.935 TFLOPS11.75 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs224320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz810 MHz
Memory bandwidth249.6 GB/s829.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.57.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 250 Watt

Tesla K20Xm has 6.4% lower power consumption.

CMP 100HX-210, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20Xm and CMP 100HX-210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K20Xm is a workstation graphics card while CMP 100HX-210 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Tesla K20Xm
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
CMP 100HX-210

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Tesla K20Xm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate CMP 100HX-210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.