Riva 128 PCI vs Tesla K10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK104NV3
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,099 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed745 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate95.360.1
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs1281

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length272 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)5.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2012 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 4 Watt

Tesla K10 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128 PCI, on the other hand, has 5525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K10 and Riva 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K10 is a workstation graphics card while Riva 128 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K10
Tesla K10
NVIDIA Riva 128 PCI
Riva 128 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate Tesla K10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Riva 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.