Quadro NVS 280 PCIe vs Tesla C2070

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.37no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF100NV37
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)25 May 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed574 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate32.141.100
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length248 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 25 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 13 Watt

Tesla C2070 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCIe, on the other hand, has 1730.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2070 and Quadro NVS 280 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
Quadro NVS 280 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.