GeForce GT 130 OEM vs Tesla C2070

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.37no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF100G94B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)10 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44848
Core clock speed574 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1412.00
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS0.12 TFLOPS
ROPs4812
TMUs5624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm229 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed747 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s24 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.01.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 10 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 75 Watt

Tesla C2070 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

GT 130 OEM, on the other hand, has 217.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2070 and GeForce GT 130 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2070 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 130 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
GeForce GT 130 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 15 votes

Rate GeForce GT 130 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.