Xbox Series S GPU vs Tesla C2050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking508not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.37no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF100Lockhart
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481280
Core clock speed574 MHz1565 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14125.2
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS4.006 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs5680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length248 mm274 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x HDMI 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 10 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 100 Watt

Xbox Series S GPU has an age advantage of 9 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 138% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2050 and Xbox Series S GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C2050 is a workstation graphics card while Xbox Series S GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
AMD Xbox Series S GPU
Xbox Series S GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 885 votes

Rate Xbox Series S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.