UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Tesla A100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGA100Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores793648
Core clock speed1110 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors38,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate550.6no data
Floating-point processing power17.62 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs496no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eno data
Maximum RAM amount40 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 28 Watt

Tesla A100 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 828.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla A100 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla A100 is a workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 233 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 445 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.