GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q vs Tesla A100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores79362048
Core clock speed1110 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1057 MHz
Number of transistors38,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate550.667.65
Floating-point processing power17.62 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs49664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount40 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2400 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla A100 has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 642.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla A100 and GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla A100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 237 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 119 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.