GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs Tegra X1
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 123 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 54 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 51.42 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | GM20B | AD107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1755 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,000 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 20 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 16.00 | 140.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.512 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 16 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 16000 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 20 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Tegra X1 has 233.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 400% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Tegra X1 and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tegra X1 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
