Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB vs Tegra K1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK20AGV10B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed756 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speed951 MHz1377 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate7.60844.06
Floating-point processing power0.3652 TFLOPS1.41 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
Tensor Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data136.5 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLES 3.14.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 30 Watt

Tegra K1 has 275% lower power consumption.

Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra K1 and Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra K1 is a desktop card while Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra K1
Tegra K1
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB
Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.