Radeon 610M vs Tegra 4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated788
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Power efficiencyno data13.24
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTegra 4Dragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed672 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors11 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.68817.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLES 3.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 610M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 4 and Radeon 610M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 4
Tegra 4
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 747 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.