GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Tegra 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated11
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.27
Power efficiencyno data11.87
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTegra 2GA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 June 2010 (14 years ago)27 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10752
Core clock speed300 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1860 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600625.0
Floating-point processing powerno data40 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs4336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data336 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,008 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2010 27 January 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 450 Watt

Tegra 2 has 2150% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 2 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 2
Tegra 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Tegra 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3234 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.