Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs TITAN Xp

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking59not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.86no data
Power efficiency13.84no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGP102Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840512
Core clock speed1405 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1750 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate379.756.00
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs24032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1426 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 April 2017 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has an age advantage of 6 years, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN Xp and Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN Xp is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 4669 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 20 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.