Tesla K40c vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Tesla K40c, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.44
+281%

TITAN V outperforms Tesla K40c by a whopping 281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.26
Power efficiency12.193.26
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGV100GK180
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $7,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V and Tesla K40c have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202880
Core clock speed1200 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6210.2
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs320240
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.103
CUDA7.03.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.44
+281%
Tesla K40c 11.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+281%
Tesla K40c 4494

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN V 156881
+798%
Tesla K40c 17468

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p152
+334%
35−40
−334%
4K82
+290%
21−24
−290%

Cost per frame, $

1440p19.73219.97
4K36.57366.62

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.44 11.66
Recency 7 December 2017 8 October 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 245 Watt

TITAN V has a 281.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla K40c, on the other hand, has 2% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K40c in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Tesla K40c is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA Tesla K40c
Tesla K40c

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3285 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate Tesla K40c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.