Radeon RX 640 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 460 Mobile Radeon RX 470 Mobile Radeon RX 480 Mobile Radeon RX 540 Radeon RX 540X Radeon RX 550 Mobile Radeon RX 550X Mobile Radeon RX 560 Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 570 Mobile Radeon RX 580 Mobile Radeon RX 580X Mobile Radeon RX 640

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with Radeon RX 640, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.54
+729%

TITAN V outperforms RX 640 by a whopping 729% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
RX 640 RX 640

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.297.41
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120640
Core clock speed1200 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate465.648.72
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS1.559 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs32040
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.54
+729%
RX 640 5.37

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+729%
RX 640 2065

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD210−220
+708%
26
−708%
1440p152
+744%
18−20
−744%
4K82
+811%
9−10
−811%

Cost per frame, $

1080p14.28no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 17
+0%
17
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
World of Tanks 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Elden Ring 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
World of Tanks 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RX 640 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 708% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 744% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 811% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.54 5.37
Recency 7 December 2017 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

TITAN V has a 729.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

RX 640, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 400% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 640 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Radeon RX 640 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RX 640 Radeon RX 640
vs
GTX 580M GeForce GTX 580M
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
vs
Arc 7 A780 Arc 7 A780
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
HD 6450 OEM Radeon HD 6450 OEM
GTX 1070 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
vs
ATI HD 4200 Radeon HD 4200
GTX 1070 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
vs
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
GTX 1070 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
HD 8870M Radeon HD 8870M
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Xbox One X GPU Xbox One X GPU
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3295 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 260 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.