GeForce RTX 4050 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and GeForce RTX 4050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.44
+18.5%

TITAN V outperforms RTX 4050 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82124
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Power efficiency12.1925.71
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGV100AD107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1200 MHz2505 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2640 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6211.2
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs32080
Tensor Cores640120
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s216.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA7.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.44
+18.5%
RTX 4050 37.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+18.5%
RTX 4050 14451

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1440p152
+26.7%
120−130
−26.7%
4K82
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%

Cost per frame, $

1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.44 37.50
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

TITAN V has a 18.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 4050 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3285 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2065 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.