Arc A750 vs TITAN V CEO Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V CEO Edition and Arc A750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V CEO Edition
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
43.98
+0.3%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.0521.80
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code nameGV100DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 June 2018 (6 years ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289
Current price$1630 $625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 260% better value for money than TITAN V CEO Edition.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203584
Core clock speed1200 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6537.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1696 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V CEO Edition 43.98
+0.3%
Arc A750 43.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+42.1%
Arc A750 11953

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms Arc A750 by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−2%
102
+2%
1440p60−65
−1.7%
61
+1.7%
4K35−40
−5.7%
37
+5.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−3.3%
62
+3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−3.5%
85−90
+3.5%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−2.2%
90−95
+2.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
−7%
100−110
+7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−1.8%
112
+1.8%
Hitman 3 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
−2.6%
195
+2.6%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−2.9%
144
+2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
−2%
100−110
+2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 280−290
−1.8%
285
+1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−1.1%
96
+1.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
−1.3%
76
+1.3%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−3.5%
85−90
+3.5%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−2.2%
90−95
+2.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
−7%
100−110
+7%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hitman 3 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−5.3%
170−180
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−5.8%
127
+5.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
−2%
100−110
+2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
−3.9%
239
+3.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
−2.8%
185
+2.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−105
−4%
100−110
+4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
−6.2%
69
+6.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
−3.5%
85−90
+3.5%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−2.2%
90−95
+2.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−2.7%
113
+2.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190−200
−4.7%
199
+4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−6.2%
69
+6.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−5%
63
+5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
−2%
100−110
+2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−1.2%
85−90
+1.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−6.7%
128
+6.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
−8%
54
+8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−4.6%
65−70
+4.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−1.3%
76
+1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−5.3%
79
+5.3%
Hitman 3 55−60
−5.5%
55−60
+5.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−2.2%
92
+2.2%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−1.2%
86
+1.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−3.6%
145
+3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−1.3%
75−80
+1.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−8.6%
35−40
+8.6%
Hitman 3 35−40
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−10%
44
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−6.2%
69
+6.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−3.7%
28
+3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−1.7%
61
+1.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−5.5%
58
+5.5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−4%
52
+4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+0%
30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how TITAN V CEO Edition and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.98 43.87
Recency 21 June 2018 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 225 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between TITAN V CEO Edition and Arc A750.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 702 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.