Radeon RX 7700S vs TITAN RTX

Place in the ranking	64	109
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.11	no data
Power efficiency	12.08	27.50
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU102	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 December 2018 (6 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	2048
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	320.0
Floating-point processing power	16.31 TFLOPS	20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	288	128
Tensor Cores	576	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	72	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 49.04
+23.1%

RX 7700S 39.85

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+23.1%

RX 7700S 15322

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

TITAN RTX 49602
+30.8%

RX 7700S 37918

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

TITAN RTX 35884
+48%

RX 7700S 24246

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	162 +39.7%	116 −39.7%
1440p	103 +74.6%	59 −74.6%
4K	73 +46%	50 −46%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	15.43	no data
1440p	24.26	no data
4K	34.23	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	166 +88.6%	88 −88.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 −7.6%	85−90 +7.6%
Elden Ring	182 +30%	140−150 −30%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	85 −23.5%	100−110 +23.5%
Counter-Strike 2	141 +85.5%	76 −85.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	91 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	351 +73.8%	202 −73.8%
Metro Exodus	135 +42.1%	95−100 −42.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	127 +62.8%	75−80 −62.8%
Valorant	246 +53.8%	160−170 −53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	205 +95.2%	100−110 −95.2%
Counter-Strike 2	120 +76.5%	68 −76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 +1.2%	85−90 −1.2%
Dota 2	153 +71.9%	89 −71.9%
Elden Ring	209 +49.3%	140−150 −49.3%
Far Cry 5	104 +60%	65 −60%
Fortnite	185 +6.9%	170−180 −6.9%
Forza Horizon 4	286 +71.3%	167 −71.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	152 +14.3%	133 −14.3%
Metro Exodus	118 +24.2%	95−100 −24.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	248 +22.8%	200−210 −22.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	93 +19.2%	75−80 −19.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +22.5%	140−150 −22.5%
Valorant	171 +6.9%	160−170 −6.9%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75 −40%	100−110 +40%
Counter-Strike 2	110 +116%	51 −116%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 −6.3%	85−90 +6.3%
Dota 2	148 +19.4%	120−130 −19.4%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +9.2%	95−100 −9.2%
Forza Horizon 4	242 +68.1%	144 −68.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	192 −5.2%	200−210 +5.2%
Valorant	236 +47.5%	160−170 −47.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	114 +70.1%	67 −70.1%
Elden Ring	130 +58.5%	80−85 −58.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	114 +70.1%	67 −70.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
World of Tanks	300−350 +23.8%	250−260 −23.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +12.3%	70−75 −12.3%
Counter-Strike 2	74 +85%	40−45 −85%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +51.2%	40−45 −51.2%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +19.4%	120−130 −19.4%
Forza Horizon 4	183 +98.9%	92 −98.9%
Metro Exodus	114 +32.6%	85−90 −32.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +34.3%	70−75 −34.3%
Valorant	192 +52.4%	120−130 −52.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45 +9.8%	40−45 −9.8%
Dota 2	134 +97.1%	68 −97.1%
Elden Ring	70 +79.5%	35−40 −79.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +97.1%	68 −97.1%
Metro Exodus	55 +66.7%	30−35 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	197 +52.7%	120−130 −52.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	41 +57.7%	24−27 −57.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	134 +97.1%	68 −97.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75 +59.6%	45−50 −59.6%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +31.7%	40−45 −31.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Dota 2	146 +84.8%	75−80 −84.8%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +35.6%	55−60 −35.6%
Fortnite	90 +57.9%	55−60 −57.9%
Forza Horizon 4	109 +127%	48 −127%
Valorant	105 +59.1%	65−70 −59.1%

This is how TITAN RTX and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 40% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 75% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 46% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the TITAN RTX is 127% faster.
in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 40% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

TITAN RTX is ahead in 56 tests (89%)
RX 7700S is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	49.04	39.85
Recency	18 December 2018	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	100 Watt