Jetson TX2 GPU vs TITAN RTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.10no data
Power efficiency12.09no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU102GP10B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 December 2018 (5 years ago)2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608256
Core clock speed1350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1465 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate509.823.44
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS0.7501 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs28816
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mm87 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.56.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 15 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson TX2 GPU, on the other hand, has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN RTX and Jetson TX2 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Jetson TX2 GPU
Jetson TX2 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 808 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Jetson TX2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.