Radeon HD 6750 vs T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Radeon HD 6750, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.22
+649%

T1200 Mobile outperforms HD 6750 by a whopping 649% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking266799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.15
Power efficiency15.362.27
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameno dataJuniper
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)21 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024720
Core clock speed855 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1425 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)86 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.008 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data73.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.22
+649%
HD 6750 2.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7803
+648%
HD 6750 1043

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+704%
HD 6750 1260

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+743%
7−8
−743%
1440p35
+775%
4−5
−775%
4K90
+650%
12−14
−650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+683%
6−7
−683%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+669%
16−18
−669%
Hitman 3 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+667%
9−10
−667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+725%
8−9
−725%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+658%
12−14
−658%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+833%
3−4
−833%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+669%
16−18
−669%
Hitman 3 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+700%
12−14
−700%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+667%
9−10
−667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+711%
9−10
−711%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+658%
12−14
−658%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+669%
16−18
−669%
Hitman 3 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+688%
8−9
−688%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+688%
8−9
−688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+825%
4−5
−825%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+850%
2−3
−850%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+657%
7−8
−657%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+693%
14−16
−693%
Hitman 3 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+650%
6−7
−650%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+683%
6−7
−683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+743%
14−16
−743%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Hitman 3 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+758%
12−14
−758%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

This is how T1200 Mobile and HD 6750 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 743% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 775% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.22 2.70
Recency 12 April 2021 21 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 86 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 648.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6750, on the other hand, has 10.5% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6750 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon HD 6750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 6750
Radeon HD 6750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 285 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.