Quadro P3000 Mobile vs T1200 Mobile

Place in the ranking	269	319
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.82	15.62
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	no data	GP104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1280
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1088 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	1215 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	97.20
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.11 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	48
TMUs	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	168 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.20
+20.2%

P3000 Mobile 16.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7793
+20.2%

P3000 Mobile 6484

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387
+18.9%

P3000 Mobile 12105

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1200 Mobile 44135
+32.2%

P3000 Mobile 33390

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+9.5%

P3000 Mobile 9256

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1200 Mobile 50827

P3000 Mobile 63332
+24.6%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T1200 Mobile 3595
+25.5%

P3000 Mobile 2864

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −8.6%	63 +8.6%
1440p	35 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%
4K	90 +210%	29 −210%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+3.2%

30−35

−3.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +46.9%	30−35 −46.9%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +3.2%	60−65 −3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +2.5%	120−130 −2.5%
Hitman 3	35−40 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +2.1%	90−95 −2.1%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +3%	65−70 −3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +3.1%	60−65 −3.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 −14.3%	30−35 +14.3%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +3.2%	60−65 −3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +2.5%	120−130 −2.5%
Hitman 3	35−40 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +2.1%	90−95 −2.1%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +3%	65−70 −3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	73 +14.1%	60−65 −14.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −80%	81 +80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 −52.4%	30−35 +52.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +2.5%	120−130 −2.5%
Hitman 3	35−40 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 −49.2%	90−95 +49.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 −1.6%	60−65 +1.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +12.1%	33 −12.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 −374%	90−95 +374%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+1.9%

50−55

−1.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +2.7%	35−40 −2.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +3.4%	27−30 −3.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 +5.9%	16−18 −5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +4.5%	21−24 −4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +3.7%	100−110 −3.7%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45 +15.4%	35−40 −15.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +20.5%	35−40 −20.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +4.5%	21−24 −4.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +2.6%	110−120 −2.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+3.1%

30−35

−3.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +3%	100−105 −3%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +5%	20−22 −5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −10%	22 +10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+0%

16−18

+0%

This is how T1200 Mobile and P3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

P3000 Mobile is 9% faster in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 30% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 210% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 47% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 374% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is ahead in 57 tests (79%)
P3000 Mobile is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
there's a draw in 8 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.20	16.81
Recency	12 April 2021	11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	75 Watt