Quadro K4100M vs T1200 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Quadro K4100M, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.22
+184%

T1200 Mobile outperforms K4100M by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking266541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.47
Power efficiency15.365.14
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241152
Core clock speed855 MHz706 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data67.78
Floating-point processing powerno data1.627 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 20.22
+184%
K4100M 7.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7803
+183%
K4100M 2753

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T1200 Mobile 44135
+122%
K4100M 19909

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T1200 Mobile 14387
+190%
K4100M 4957

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T1200 Mobile 10134
+177%
K4100M 3654

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T1200 Mobile 50827
+106%
K4100M 24685

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+22.9%
48
−22.9%
1440p35
+192%
12−14
−192%
4K90
+592%
13
−592%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+422%
9−10
−422%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+162%
45−50
−162%
Hitman 3 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+129%
40−45
−129%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+245%
20−22
−245%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+175%
24−27
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+68.5%
50−55
−68.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+162%
45−50
−162%
Hitman 3 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+129%
40−45
−129%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+245%
20−22
−245%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+204%
24−27
−204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−48.9%
67
+48.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+68.5%
50−55
−68.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+133%
9−10
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+191%
10−12
−191%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+162%
45−50
−162%
Hitman 3 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
+50%
40−45
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+163%
24−27
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+68.2%
21−24
−68.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
−184%
50−55
+184%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+344%
24−27
−344%
Hitman 3 21−24
+109%
10−12
−109%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+840%
5−6
−840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+162%
45−50
−162%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Hitman 3 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+348%
21−24
−348%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%

This is how T1200 Mobile and K4100M compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 23% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 192% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 592% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 1000% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K4100M is 184% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • K4100M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.22 7.13
Recency 12 April 2021 23 July 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 100 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 183.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 5.3% lower power consumption.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4100M in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K4100M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 77 votes

Rate Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.