RTX A500 Embedded vs T1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1000 with RTX A500 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

T1000
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
19.84
+289%

T1000 outperforms RTX A500 Embedded by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking283629
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.3217.55
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA107S
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962048
Core clock speed1065 MHz435 MHz
Boost clock speed1395 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate78.1285.44
Floating-point processing power2.5 TFLOPS5.468 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 19.84
+289%
RTX A500 Embedded 5.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 7628
+289%
RTX A500 Embedded 1959

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+314%
14−16
−314%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+350%
10−11
−350%
Elden Ring 52
+333%
12−14
−333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+325%
8−9
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+314%
21−24
−314%
Metro Exodus 62
+343%
14−16
−343%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Valorant 80−85
+344%
18−20
−344%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+300%
7−8
−300%
Dota 2 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
Elden Ring 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Far Cry 5 130
+333%
30−33
−333%
Fortnite 100−110
+338%
24−27
−338%
Forza Horizon 4 69
+331%
16−18
−331%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
Metro Exodus 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+347%
30−33
−347%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Valorant 80−85
+344%
18−20
−344%
World of Tanks 230−240
+320%
55−60
−320%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+300%
6−7
−300%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+313%
16−18
−313%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+347%
30−33
−347%
Valorant 80−85
+344%
18−20
−344%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%
Elden Ring 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
World of Tanks 130−140
+350%
30−33
−350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+342%
12−14
−342%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+325%
12−14
−325%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Valorant 50−55
+325%
12−14
−325%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Dota 2 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Elden Ring 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Fortnite 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Valorant 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%

This is how T1000 and RTX A500 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • T1000 is 314% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.84 5.10
Recency 6 May 2021 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 20 Watt

T1000 has a 289% higher aggregate performance score.

RTX A500 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A500 Embedded in performance tests.

Be aware that T1000 is a workstation card while RTX A500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1000
T1000
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
RTX A500 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.