GeForce RTX 4050 vs STG

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated120
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Power efficiencyno data25.87
Architectureno dataAda Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV1AD107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed75 MHz2505 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2640 MHz
Number of transistors1 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08211.2
Floating-point processing powerno data13.52 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs180
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/s216.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W31x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 100 Watt

STG has 4900% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050, on the other hand, has a 614300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG and GeForce RTX 4050. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG
STG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 5 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1908 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.