GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs STG-2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated162
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.02
Power efficiencyno data18.14
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV1GA106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed75 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistors1 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08142.2
Floating-point processing powerno data9.098 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs180
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mm242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W31x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 130 Watt

STG-2000 has 6400% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 26 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG-2000 and GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 64 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12024 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.