ATI Mobility 128 M3 vs SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| GPU code name | SISM672 | M3 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 January 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 February 2000 (24 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 250 MHz | 105 MHz |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 105 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | DDR |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2007 | 1 February 2000 |
SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX has an age advantage of 6 years.
We couldn't decide between SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX and Mobility 128 M3. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
