GeForce MX230 vs Riva TNT2 Ultra
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 638 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 32.89 |
| Architecture | Fahrenheit (1998−2000) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | NV5 B5 | GP108 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 March 1999 (25 years ago) | 21 February 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 150 MHz | 1519 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1582 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 15 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 250 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.3 | 25.31 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.81 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 2 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | SDR | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 183 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.928 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x VGA, 2x S-Video | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 6.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 1999 | 21 February 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 250 nm | 14 nm |
GeForce MX230 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 Ultra and GeForce MX230. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Riva TNT2 Ultra is a desktop card while GeForce MX230 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
