Quadro RTX 6000 vs Riva 128ZX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated66
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.67
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV3TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 February 1998 (26 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed100 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors4 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data260 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1509.8
Floating-point performanceno data16.31 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 MB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 1998 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 12 nm

RTX 6000 has an age advantage of 20 years, a 307100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128ZX and Quadro RTX 6000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva 128ZX is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128ZX
Riva 128ZX
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Riva 128ZX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 125 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.