Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Riva 128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated531
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Power efficiencyno data34.97
Architectureno dataVega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV3Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 1997 (27 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed100 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors4 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology350 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRno data
Maximum RAM amount4 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed100 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012_1
OpenGL1.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 350 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

Riva 128 has 275% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and Radeon RX Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva 128 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Radeon RX Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 36 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5001 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.