GeForce MX330 vs ATI Rage XL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data43.84
ArchitectureRage 3 (1997−1998)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRage 3GP108
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 August 1998 (26 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed125 MHz1531 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1594 MHz
Number of transistors8 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1338.26
Floating-point processing powerno data1.224 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed83 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1998 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 14 nm

GeForce MX330 has an age advantage of 21 year, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage XL and GeForce MX330. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage XL is a workstation card while GeForce MX330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage XL
Rage XL
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GeForce MX330

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 18 votes

Rate Rage XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2171 vote

Rate GeForce MX330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.