Trace: try redirect_from

Trace: select _id, title from ss_cards where redirect_to=3118

RTX A500 Mobile vs ATI Rage Mobility-M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRage MobilityGA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 1999 (25 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed75 MHzno data
Number of transistors4 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology350 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate0.0898.37
Floating-point performanceno data6.296 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed70 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth560.0 MB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 1999 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 8 nm

RTX A500 Mobile has an age advantage of 23 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage Mobility-M and RTX A500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage Mobility-M is a desktop card while RTX A500 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage Mobility-M
Rage Mobility-M
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 73 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.