Radeon RX Vega M vs ATI Rage 128 GL PCI
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 317 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 79.32 |
| Architecture | Rage 4 (1998−1999) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Rage 4 | Vega |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 August 1998 (26 years ago) | 1 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 103 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1190 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 8 million | 4,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 250 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.21 | 38.08 |
| ROPs | 2 | 8 |
| TMUs | 2 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCI | IGP |
| Width | 1-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | SDR | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 103 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 1.648 GB/s | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x VGA | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 6.0 | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 August 1998 | 1 February 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 250 nm | 14 nm |
RX Vega M has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Rage 128 GL PCI and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Rage 128 GL PCI is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
