Radeon Pro 5600M vs ATI Xpress X1270

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.27
Architectureno dataRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameM690TNavi 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2007 (17 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42560
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1030 MHz
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data164.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.274 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data770 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data394.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2007 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm

Pro 5600M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress X1270 and Radeon Pro 5600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress X1270 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress X1270
Radeon Xpress X1270
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress X1270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.