RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 200M with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 200M
2005
0.06

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms ATI Xpress 200M by a whopping 106933% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.45
ArchitectureR300 (2005−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRC410AD104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2005 (19 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores66144
Core clock speed336 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors107 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate0.67417.6
Floating-point processing powerno data26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs2192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data360.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Xpress 200M 0.06
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.22
+106933%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 200M 22
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24773
+112505%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−106567%
3200−3250
+106567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−106150%
4250−4300
+106150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−106775%
8550−8600
+106775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−106150%
4250−4300
+106150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−106864%
29950−30000
+106864%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−106567%
3200−3250
+106567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−106150%
4250−4300
+106150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−106775%
8550−8600
+106775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−106150%
4250−4300
+106150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−106567%
9600−9650
+106567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−106864%
29950−30000
+106864%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−106567%
3200−3250
+106567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−106150%
4250−4300
+106150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−106775%
8550−8600
+106775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−106150%
4250−4300
+106150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−106567%
9600−9650
+106567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−106864%
29950−30000
+106864%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−106567%
6400−6450
+106567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−104900%
1050−1100
+104900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−104900%
2100−2150
+104900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.06 64.22
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 106933.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200M is a notebook card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress 200M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 41 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.