UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 649 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.61 |
| Architecture | Rage 9 (2003−2006) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | RS480 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 November 2004 (19 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 107 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.200 | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | no data |
| TMUs | 4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | no data |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0 | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 November 2004 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 200 IGP and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Xpress 200 IGP is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
