UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

Place in the ranking	1445	755
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	8.65
Architecture	R400 (2004−2008)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	RS690	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 February 2007 (17 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4	32
Core clock speed	400 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	400 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	120 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.600	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	4	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0b (9_2)	12_1
OpenGL	2.0	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	13
4K	-0−1	9

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −140%	12 +140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −50%	6 +50%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −117%	13 +117%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −120%	11 +120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −540%	32 +540%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
World of Tanks	10−11 −200%	30 +200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−2100%

21−24
+2100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Valorant	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	0−1	9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	2−3
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +66.7%	9 −66.7%
Valorant	0−1	3−4

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	8 +0%	8 +0%
Valorant	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	12 +0%	12 +0%
Elden Ring	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Fortnite	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 +0%	7 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	20 +0%	20 +0%
Valorant	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Elden Ring	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
World of Tanks	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Xpress 1250 is 67% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI Xpress 1250 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 26 tests (47%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.11	3.14
Recency	28 February 2007	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	80 nm	10 nm

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 2754.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1250 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.