Quadro K5000 SYNC vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1443not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRS690GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 February 2007 (17 years ago)25 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores41536
Core clock speed400 MHz706 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors120 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data122 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60090.37
Floating-point processing powerno data2.169 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data172.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x SDI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 February 2007 25 January 2013
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

K5000 SYNC has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1250 and Quadro K5000 SYNC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook card while Quadro K5000 SYNC is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Radeon Xpress 1250
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
Quadro K5000 SYNC

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 25 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 SYNC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.