GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Xpress 1250 with GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

ATI Xpress 1250
2007
0.11

RTX 3050 4 GB outperforms ATI Xpress 1250 by a whopping 15955% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1454318
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.32
Power efficiencyno data13.66
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRS690GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 February 2007 (17 years ago)27 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42048
Core clock speed400 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistors120 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600111.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Xpress 1250 0.11
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.66
+15955%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 1250 42
RTX 3050 4 GB 6859
+16231%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−15733%
950−1000
+15733%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
World of Tanks 9−10
−15456%
1400−1450
+15456%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−15733%
950−1000
+15733%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−15900%
160−170
+15900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%
Valorant 4−5
−14900%
600−650
+14900%

4K
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
−15900%
2400−2450
+15900%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−15900%
2400−2450
+15900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−15900%
2400−2450
+15900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
−15900%
2400−2450
+15900%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 17.66
Recency 28 February 2007 27 January 2022
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 4 GB has a 15954.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1250 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Radeon Xpress 1250
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2709 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Xpress 1250 or GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.