GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

Place in the ranking	1454	282
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Power efficiency	no data	27.97
Architecture	R400 (2004−2008)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	RS690	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 February 2007 (17 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4	1024
Core clock speed	400 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	400 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	120 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.600	95.04
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	4	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0b (9_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	2.0	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Xpress 1250 0.11

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.09
+18164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Xpress 1250 42

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+18462%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	59
1440p	-0−1	43
4K	-0−1	25

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −282%	42 +282%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2850%	59 +2850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −227%	36 +227%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1800%	95 +1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1000%	44 +1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −173%	30 +173%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1500%	32 +1500%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1067%	70 +1067%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1400%	75 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −2620%	130−140 +2620%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −625%	29 +625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1500%	60−65 +1500%
World of Tanks	10−11 −2230%	230−240 +2230%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −227%	35−40 +227%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1350%	29 +1350%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1017%	65−70 +1017%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1160%	63 +1160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −2620%	130−140 +2620%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −16567%	500−550 +16567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −11700%	110−120 +11700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −625%	27−30 +625%
Valorant	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	0−1	60−65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	22
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6 +200%
Dota 2	14−16 −247%	52 +247%
Valorant	0−1	24−27