GeForce 9800S vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | RS482M | G94 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2006 (18 years ago) | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 64 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 2 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 505 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 110 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.8 | 19.20 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 0.192 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | VGAHDMISingle Link DVI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF + HDA |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2006 | 15 July 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 110 nm | 65 nm |
GeForce 9800S has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 69.2% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1150 and GeForce 9800S. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Xpress 1150 is a notebook card while GeForce 9800S is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
