ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)no data
GPU code nameRS485Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 May 2006 (18 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed400 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm350 nm
Texture fill rate0.80.08
ROPs21
TMUs21

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 2x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.06.0
OpenGL2.01.1
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2006 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 110 nm 350 nm

ATI Xpress 1150 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 218.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Xpress 1150 and 3D Rage PRO Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
Radeon Xpress 1150
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo
3D Rage PRO Turbo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 60 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.