ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs ATI Radeon X850 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1381not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.21no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameR480RV516
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 December 2004 (19 years ago)2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed520 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors160 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate8.3202.400
ROPs164
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed540 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth34.56 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 32 Watt

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 115.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X850 XT and FireMV 2250 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X850 XT
Radeon X850 XT
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon X850 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.