GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q vs ATI Radeon X800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1372not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.51no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR430AD106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed400 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1230 MHz
Number of transistors160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800177.1
Floating-point processing powerno data11.34 TFLOPS
ROPs1248
TMUs12144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2004 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

ATI X800 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 and GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800
Radeon X800
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 41 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.