ATI Rage 128 GL vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1412not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.25no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameR423Rage 4
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2004 (20 years ago)1 August 1998 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed475 MHz80 MHz
Number of transistors160 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.7000.16
ROPs122
TMUs122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 2x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz60 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s960.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)6.0
OpenGL2.01.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2004 1 August 1998
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 250 nm

ATI X800 PRO has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 92.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 PRO and Rage 128 GL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X800 PRO is a desktop card while Rage 128 GL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO
ATI Rage 128 GL
Rage 128 GL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Rage 128 GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.