GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated6
Place by popularitynot in top-10077
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.82
Power efficiencyno data20.18
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR423AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7680
Core clock speed475 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors160 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate5.700626.4
Floating-point processing powerno data40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs1280
TMUs12240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X800 PRO 64
RTX 4070 Ti 31830
+49634%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2004 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 285 Watt

ATI X800 PRO has 493.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 PRO and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6911 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.