ATI Radeon X1950 PRO vs ATI X800 GTO
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon X800 GTO and Radeon X1950 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1343 | 1347 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.41 | 0.30 |
| Architecture | R400 (2004−2008) | R500 (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | R423 | RV570 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 December 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 October 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 160 million | 330 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 49 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.800 | 6.900 |
| ROPs | 12 | 12 |
| TMUs | 12 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 350 MHz | 690 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | 44.16 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0b (9_2) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | no data | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 December 2007 | 1 October 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 49 Watt | 66 Watt |
ATI X800 GTO has an age advantage of 1 year, and 34.7% lower power consumption.
ATI X1950 PRO, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon X800 GTO and Radeon X1950 PRO.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
