Arc 3 A350M vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR423DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 December 2007 (16 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors160 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80055.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs1224
TMUs1248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed350 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 December 2007 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 25 Watt

Arc 3 A350M has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 96% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X800 GTO and Arc 3 A350M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO
Intel Arc 3 A350M
Arc 3 A350M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 31 vote

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Arc 3 A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.